| 
   
 REPORT DIGEST     ILLINOIS YOUTH CENTER - ST. CHARLES     LIMITED SCOPECOMPLIANCE ATTESTATION EXAMINATION For the Two Years Ended: June 30, 2006   Summary of Findings:   Total this examination 2 Total last examination 0 Repeated from last examination 0   Release Date: June 20, 2007 
 
 
 State of Illinois Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL   To obtain a copy of the
  Report contact: Office of the Auditor
  General Iles Park Plaza 740 E. Ash Street Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888)
  261-2887   This Report Digest and the Full Report are also available on the worldwide web at http://www.auditor.illinois.gov  | 
  
   
 
 
 
 
 SYNOPSIS
  
 ¨ The Center did not maintain adequate controls over meal reimbursements for dinner.   ¨ The Center made contractual payments in advance of contract terms.   
             
           (Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on
  the reverse page)  | 
 
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
ILLINOIS YOUTH CENTER - ST. CHARLES
LIMITED SCOPE COMPLIANCE
EXAMINATION
For the Two Years Ended June 30,
2006
| 
   EXPENDITURE STATISTICS  | 
  
  FY 2006 | 
  
   FY 2005  | 
  
   FY 2004  | 
 
| 
     Total Expenditures (All Appropriated Funds)....   Personal Services........................................... % of Total Expenditures........................  | 
  
     $21,600,687   $14,514,417 67.2%  | 
  
     $23,731,065   $15,592,800 65.7%  | 
  
     $24,329,447   $16,424,191 67.5%  | 
 
| 
   Average No. of Employees..................  | 
  
   257  | 
  
   273  | 
  
   303  | 
 
| 
   Average Salary Per Employee.............  | 
  
   $56,476    | 
  
   $57,116    | 
  
   $54,205    | 
 
| 
   Student, Member and Inmate Compensation.  | 
  
   $51,120  | 
  
   $59,019  | 
  
   $68,798  | 
 
| 
   % of Total Expenditures....................  | 
  
   .2%  | 
  
   .2%  | 
  
   .3%  | 
 
| 
   
  | 
  
      | 
  
      | 
  
      | 
 
| 
   Other Payroll Costs (FICA, Retirement).....  | 
  
   $2,396,954  | 
  
   $3,568,133  | 
  
   $3,560,842  | 
 
| 
   % of Total Expenditures................  | 
  
   11.1%  | 
  
   15.0%  | 
  
   14.6%  | 
 
| 
      | 
  
      | 
  
      | 
  
      | 
 
| 
   Contractual Services......................  | 
  
   $3,636,479  | 
  
   $3,300,070  | 
  
   $3,376,479  | 
 
| 
   % of Total Expenditures................  | 
  
   16.8%  | 
  
   14.0%  | 
  
   13.9%  | 
 
| 
      | 
  
      | 
  
      | 
  
      | 
 
| 
   All Other Items.......................................  | 
  
   $1,001,717  | 
  
   $1,211,043  | 
  
   $899,137  | 
 
| 
   % of Total Expenditures...................  | 
  
   4.7%  | 
  
   5.1%  | 
  
   3.7%  | 
 
| 
   Cost of Property and Equipment.................  | 
  
   $33,993,432  | 
  
   $33,969,043  | 
  
   $33,311,684  | 
 
 
| 
   SELECTED ACTIVITY MEASURES (Not
  examined)  | 
  
   FY 2006  | 
  
   FY 2005  | 
  
   FY 2004  | 
 
| 
   Average Number of Inmates  | 
  
   330  | 
  
   362  | 
  
   409  | 
 
| 
   Ratio of Youth Supervisors to Inmates  | 
  
   1 / 2.0  | 
  
   1 / 2.0  | 
  
   1 / 2.1  | 
 
| 
   Cost Per Year Per Inmate  | 
  
   $65,410  | 
  
   $65,321  | 
  
   $59,421  | 
 
| 
   Rated Inmate Capacity  | 
  |||
| 
   Approximate Square Feet Per Inmate  | 
  
   69  | 
  
   63  | 
  
   56  | 
 
 
| 
   CENTER WARDEN  | 
 
| 
   During Period and Current: Janice Shallcross (Transfer out 3/31/06), Bobby Moore (4/1/06 – current)  | 
 
 
 
| 
   
                       
 Meal
  reimbursements for dinner were paid without meeting meal allowance
  requirements                        | 
  
  FINDINGS,
  CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
    INADEQUATE CONTROLS OVER MEAL REIMBURSEMENTS FOR DINNER   
  ·       
  Twenty-three of
  47 (49%) travel vouchers tested contained instances totaling $1,207 in fiscal
  year 2005 and $170 in fiscal year 2006 in which employees were paid meal
  reimbursements for dinner without meeting meal allowance requirements.  Travel times indicated on vouchers
  submitted did not agree to Center movement records.    
  ·       
  Twenty-four of 47
  (51%) travel vouchers tested contained instances totaling $1,479 in fiscal
  year 2005 and $306 in fiscal year 2006 in which employees were paid meal
  reimbursements for dinner in which the Center records could not support.  Travelers completed vouchers claiming meal
  reimbursements, however, the movement records did not list the travelers on
  the travel status.     
  ·       
  Seven of 47 (15%)
  travel vouchers tested contained instances totaling $136 in fiscal year 2005
  in which auditors were unable to determine if employees were entitled to meal
  reimbursements for dinner.  Center
  movement records were incomplete. 
  Movement sheets contained missing travel times, which made it
  difficult to determine if the claimed meal reimbursements were accurate.  (Finding 1, pages 9-10)   We recommended the Center implement controls to
  verify claimed travel reimbursements. 
  In addition, we recommended the Center request reimbursement from employees
  for the improper claimed dinner meal reimbursements. Center management accepted our recommendation.    | 
 
| 
         The Center paid
  health services fees in advance of the contract terms      | 
  
  NONCOMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACT TERMS  The Center did not comply with contract terms during fiscal year 2006. Contract payments for two months for health services, totaling $365,215, were paid 32 to 45 days in advance of the contract terms. (Finding 2, page 11)   We recommended the Center monitor the contract
  to ensure all terms are met.     Center management accepted our recommendation.   
  | 
 
| 
      | 
  
   AUDITORS’ OPINION 
 We conducted a compliance attestation examination of the Center as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. This was a limited scope compliance attestation examination that also included performing certain agreed-upon procedures with respect to the accounting records of the Center to assist our examination of the entire Department. Financial statements for the entire Department will be presented in that report.         ___________________________________ WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General   WGH:GSR:pp   ASSIGNED AUDITORS   The Auditor General’s staff conducted this examination.  |