REPORT DIGEST

 

 

EXECUTIVE ETHICS COMMISSION

 

COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION

For the Two Years Ended:

June 30, 2008

 

Summary of Findings:

 

Total this audit                  1

Total last audit                  1

Repeated from last audit   0

 

 

Release Date:

January 8, 2009

 

State of Illinois

Office of the Auditor General

WILLIAM G. HOLLAND

AUDITOR GENERAL

 

To obtain a copy of the Report contact:

Office of the Auditor General

Iles Park Plaza

740 E. Ash Street

Springfield, IL 62703

(217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887

 

This Report Digest and Full Report are also available on

the worldwide web at

http://www.auditor.illinois.gov

 

 

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

      In December 2003, the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act (Act) (5 ILCS 430/et seq.) created the Executive Ethics Commission. 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

 

 

¨      The Executive Ethics Commission did not maintain adequate segregation of duties in the areas of expenditure control and fixed assets.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

{Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on the reverse page.}

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE ETHICS COMMISSION

COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION

For the Two Years Ended June 30, 2008

 

EXPENDITURE STATISTICS

FY 2008

FY 2007

Total Expenditures...................................................

$266,832

$274,140

Expenditures from Lump Sums

 

 

Personal Services..............................................

     Average No. of Employees...........................

$158,783

                      2

$153,702

               2

Employee Retirement Contributions Paid by Employer...................................................

 

$6,356

 

$6,154

State Contribution to State Employees’ Retirement

       System…………………………………..

State Contributions to Social Security…………….    

 

       $26,316

            $11,764

 

$17,731

            $11,421

Contractual Services...........................................

$30,742

$53,457

Travel................................................................

$15,362

$14,793

Commodities......................................................

$2,424

$2,031

Printing..............................................................

$7,250

$11,799

Equipment..........................................................

$3,900

$149

Telecommunications...........................................

$3,935

$2,903

Total............................................................

Cost of Property and Equipment……………………….

$266,832

                 $24,559

$274,140

                 $22,331

 

SELECTED ACTIVITY MEASURES  (Not Examined)

 

 

Action taken on each of the petitions received by the Executive Ethics Commission

 

FY2008

 

FY2007

Action

 

 

 

 

  Granted petition

  Denied petition

  Petition was withdrawn

  Determination prohibition did not apply

  Petition remains open

            Total petitions received

 

2

0

0

4

1

7

 

3

0

1

4

0

8

 

 

Agency Executive Director

     During Examination Period:  Chad Fornoff

     Currently:  Chad Fornoff

 


 

 

 

 

 

 


 Duties were not properly    

 segregated

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 

INADEQUATE SEGREGATION OF DUTIES

 

      The Executive Ethics Commission (Commission) did not maintain adequate segregation of duties in the areas of expenditure control and fixed assets. We noted one person had authority to approve vouchers, maintain accounting records and perform monthly expenditure reconciliations. Furthermore, one person had authority to approve all fixed asset purchases, tag all inventory, maintain the property records and complete the quarterly fixed asset reports. (Finding 1, page 8)

 

      We recommended the Commission properly segregate the duties in order to maintain effective internal controls over the expenditure records and fixed assets.

 

      The Commission accepted our recommendation.

 

 

AUDITORS’ OPINION

 

      We conducted a compliance examination of the Office as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act.   We have not audited any financial statements of the Office for the purpose of expressing an opinion because the Office does not, nor is it required to, prepare financial statements.

 

 

 

 

____________________________________

WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General

 

WGH:GSR:pp

 

AUDITORS ASSIGNED

 

      This compliance examination was performed by staff of the Office of the Auditor General.