REPORT DIGEST

 

HISTORIC PRESERVATION AGENCY

 

COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION

For the Two Years Ended:

June 30, 2008

 

Summary of Findings:

Total this audit                    15

Total last audit                      9

Repeated from last audit       5

 

Release Date:

June 11, 2009

 

 

State of Illinois

Office of the Auditor General

WILLIAM G. HOLLAND

AUDITOR GENERAL

 

 

 

 

 

To obtain a copy of the Report contact:

Office of the Auditor General

Iles Park Plaza

740 E. Ash Street

Springfield, IL 62703

(217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887

 

This Report Digest and Full Report are also available on

the worldwide web at

http://www.auditor.illinois.gov

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

 

 

¨      The Agency did not exercise adequate controls over its administration of State grants.

 

¨      The Agency did not adequately monitor a grantee carrying out the duties of the Amistad Commission.

 

¨      The Agency inappropriately prepaid vendors for contracted services.

 

¨      The Agency did not develop required business plans for certain historic sites.

 

¨      The Agency did not publish its intent to award sole source contracts in the Illinois Procurement Bulletin as required.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


{Expenditures and Activity Measures are summarized on the reverse page.}

 

 

 


HISTORIC PRESERVATION AGENCY

COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION

For The Two Years Ended June 30, 2008

EXPENDITURE STATISTICS

FY 2008

FY 2007

FY 2006

Total Expenditures (All Funds)...............

 

$28,038,287

$27,156,079

$23,890,701

  OPERATIONS TOTAL.......................

         % of Total Expenditures.................

$27,333,900

97.5%

$25,907,891

95.4%

$23,570,022

98.7%

          Personal Services..........................

            % of Operations Expenditures....

            Average No. of Employees.......

$8,811,867

32.2%

242

$8,730,815

33.7%

249

$8,828,197

37.5%

250

         Other Payroll Costs (FICA,

          Retirement, Insurance)..................

            % of Operations Expenditures....

 

$2,204,394

8.1%

 

$1,737,193

6.7%

 

$1,478,699

6.3%

         Contractual Services....................

            % of Operations Expenditures...

$1,644,511

6.0%

$1,684,349

6.5%

$1,687,583

7.1%

Presidential Library and Museum..

            % of Operations Expenditures....

$10,831,718

39.6%

$10,654,790

41.1%

$9,164,059

38.9%

         All Other Operations Items..........

            % of Operations Expenditures....

$3,841,410

14.1%

$3,100,744

12.0%

$2,411,484

10.2%

  AWARDS AND GRANTS TOTAL....

         % of Total Expenditures................

$607,727

2.2%

$237,053

0.9%

$71,188

0.3%

  PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL

         % of Total Expenditures..............

$96,660

0.3%

$1,011,135

3.7%

$249,491

1.0%

Cost of Property and Equipment........

$291,274,422

$284,889,206

$277,605,829 

 

SELECTED ACTIVITY MEASURES (not examined)

FY 2008

FY 2007

FY 2006

Visitors to Sites:

 

 

 

     All State-owned Historical Sites..........................

2,206,587

2,300,880

2,497,726

     Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library ................

66,647

68,620

85,715

     Lincoln’s New Salem.........................................

430,111

424,292

499,443

     Cahokia Mounds................................................

311,044

303,341

309,181

     Lincoln's Tomb..................................................

336,322

339,241

377,645

     Old State Capitol/Lincoln Herndon......................

139,699

159,645

161,051

     IL Vietnam Veterans Memorial..........................

213,584

254,431

283,334

     Black Hawk......................................................

124,974

141,251

142,942

 

AGENCY DIRECTOR(S)

     During Audit Period:  Robert Coomer (until 12/31/07), Jennifer Tirey (Interim Director 1/1/08-4/15/08), Janet Grimes (effective 4/16/08)

     Currently:  Janet Grimes

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grant agreements did not require unexpended funds to be returned to the State

 

Grant agreements did not contain detailed financial budgets

 

 

Quarterly reports and evaluation summaries were missing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grantee not adequately monitored

 

 

 

 

$100,000 paid without an agreement

 

 

 

No detailed receipts or invoices maintained

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Payments for operation and maintenance of historic sites prior to receipt of services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payment for vehicle made prior to receipt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Business plans for historic sites related to Abraham Lincoln were not developed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notice of intent to enter into sole source contracts not published

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

 

INADEQUATE CONTROL OVER GRANT MONITORING

 

      The Agency did not exercise adequate controls over its administration of State grants.  We reviewed 14 State grants awarded for educational, interpretative and special events related to the Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Celebration, 5 grants provided to Certified Local Governments to assist in the implementation of their local preservation programs, and a grant to a Historical Society for costs in the operation of a historic site.  We noted the following:

 

·        Fifteen of 20 (75%) grant agreements tested, totaling $588,759, did not contain a provision requiring all funds unexpended at the end of the grant agreement period to be returned to the State within 45 days.

 

·        Five of 20 (25%) grant agreements tested, totaling $292,801, did not include detailed financial budgets or other detailed information regarding the use or purpose of the grant funds.

 

·        Six of 20 (30%) grants tested, totaling $311,082, were missing a total of nine quarterly reports.

 

·        Two of 20 (10%) grants tested, totaling $131,000, were missing an evaluation summary.

 

·         One of 20 (5%) grants tested, totaling $183,750, was missing the final report.  (Finding 1, pages 12-13) 

 

      We recommended the Agency implement controls to ensure grant agreements contain provisions necessary to properly administer State grant funds.  In addition, we recommended the Agency implement controls to ensure Agency grant monitors require grantees to submit required reports timely to ensure grant funds are being expended as intended.

 

 The Agency concurred with our recommendation and stated the omitted provision in the agreement pertaining to unspent funds was an oversight.  In addition, the Agency will reinforce the various reporting requirements with grantees and stress with staff the importance of closely monitoring the grants.

           

INADEQUATE ADMINISTRATION OF THE AMISTAD COMMISSION

 

The Agency did not adequately monitor a grantee carrying out the duties of the Amistad Commission.  In addition, the Agency was not fully complying with all requirements of the Historic Preservation Act (Act) regarding the Amistad Commission.  We noted the following:

 

·        The Agency paid the grantee $100,000, on an FY07 voucher that stated on its face “to prepare and distribute appropriate curriculum materials to assist schools in training all students about the history of slavery and related issues.”  There was no agreement signed by the parties that covered this payment.  The supporting documentation for the voucher did not contain detailed receipts or invoices and only consisted of a memo to the Agency’s Director dated August 27, 2007 that detailed the use of the funds for an event that would take place on January 19, 2008 and contained the following details:

 

·        $18,480 for catering costs

·        $5,000 for a conference and banquet hall

·        $40,000 for 4 keynote speakers (contracted at $10,000 each)

·     $2,000 for the 4 speakers’ overnight accommodations and $2,000 for their air transportation

·       $6,000 for production and printing of the booklets

·        $1,050 for the printing of invitations and $400 for mailing

·        $10,000 for administrative/indirect costs

·        $10,070 for development of a library for Commission members

·        $5,000 to fund tickets for students to attend an education play. (Finding 2, pages 14-15)

 

We recommended the Agency ensure the requirements of the Act are being met by monitoring grantee expenditures and activities for reasonableness and compliance with State laws.

 

Agency officials concurred with our recommendation and stated they will work with the Amistad Commission more closely to insure reporting is timely and complete including supporting documentation for Commission activities.

 

INAPPROPRIATE PREPAYMENTS

 

      The Agency inappropriately prepaid vendors for contracted services.  During testing, we noted four instances where the Agency paid in advance for goods and services:

 

·        The Agency contracted with various vendors to perform maintenance services and to operate historic sites.  During FY07, a vendor was paid the annual contracted total of $13,500 in August 2006 and another vendor was paid the annual contracted total of $15,000 in February 2007.  During FY08, a third vendor was paid the annual contracted total of $9,500 in October 2007.  These payments were issued without detailed invoices or other supporting documentation and prior to Agency receipt of from 4 to 10 months of the contracted services.  None of the contracts or vouchers contained an advance payment clause or other documentation noting the services were being paid in advance. 

·        The Agency issued a voucher totaling $17,145 on 8/20/07 for a vehicle that had been ordered in April 2007 but was not received by the Agency until 8/30/07. (Finding 3, pages 16-17) 

 

      We recommended the Agency only make payments for services rendered unless otherwise stipulated in the contract and ensure proper documentation is received prior to processing payments to vendors.

     

       Agency officials concurred with our recommendation and stated they will process payments after services or goods are rendered or received, unless stipulated in the contract, and only after receiving the final invoice. 

 

FAILURE TO DEVELOP INDIVIDUAL BUSINESS PLANS FOR HISTORIC SITES

 

      The Agency did not develop required individual business plans for the historic sites at the Old State Capital, Lincoln Herndon Law Offices, and New Salem.

 

The Historic Preservation Act (Act) was amended, effective August 14, 2007, to require the Agency to create an individual business plan for each historic site related to Abraham Lincoln no later than January 1, 2008.  Each business plan was required to address ways to enhance tourism at the historic site and the historic aspect of each site. (Finding 5, page 19)

 

We recommended the Agency comply with the statute by developing individual business plans for the Old State Capital, Lincoln Herndon Law Offices, and New Salem or seek legislative changes to remove the requirements.

 

Agency officials concurred with our recommendation and stated the lack of funding and staff prevented such studies from being performed.  The Agency will seek to have the statutory requirement changed or removed.

 

FAILURE TO PUBLISH NOTICES IN THE ILLINOIS PROCUREMENT BULLETIN

 

       The Agency did not publish its intent to award sole source contracts in the Illinois Procurement Bulletin (Bulletin) as required.

 

The Agency failed to publish its notice of intent to enter into sole source contracts in the Bulletin for a contract for professional documentary services totaling $24,000 in FY07 and a contract for the maintenance and security of fire and alarm systems with related expenditures of $32,544 and $47,201, in FY07 and FY08, respectively. (Finding 9, page 23)

 

We recommended the Agency implement and maintain procedures to ensure it adheres to the Illinois Procurement Code’s requirements regarding the publishing of sole source contracts on the Bulletin.

 

       Agency officials concurred with our recommendation and stated they will publish all notices when required.

 

 

OTHER FINDINGS

 

      The remaining findings are reportedly being given attention by the Agency.  We will review the Agency's progress toward implementation of our recommendations in our next compliance examination.

 

STATE COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION –ACCOUNTANTS REPORT

 

      The auditors qualified their report on State Compliance for findings 08-1, 08-2, and 08-3.  Except for the noncompliance described in these findings, the auditors state the Agency complied, in all material respects, with the requirement described in the report.

 

 

 

 

____________________________________

WILLIAM G. HOLLAND, Auditor General

 

WGH:PH:pp

 

 

 

ASSIGNED AUDITORS

 

    The compliance examination was conducted by the Auditor General’s staff.