| 
   REPORT DIGEST REGIONAL
  OFFICE OF EDUCATION #48 FINANCIAL
  AUDIT (In Accordance with the 
	Single Audit Act and OMB Circular A-133) For the Year Ended: June 30, 2009 Summary
  of Findings: Total this audit                       5 Total last audit                       8 Repeated from
  last audit        5 Release Date: January 14, 2010 
 
 
 State of I Office of the Auditor General WILLIAM
  G. HOLLAND AUDITOR GENERAL 
 
 
 To
  obtain a copy of the Report contact: Office
  of the Auditor General (217)
  782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This
  Report Digest and Full Report are also available on the
  worldwide web at http://www.auditor.illinois.gov  | 
  
   | 
  
   SYNOPSIS 
 ·        
  The Regional Office of Education #48 lacked adequate policies and procedures
  over certain administrative functions.  
 ·        
  The Regional Office of Education #48 did not have
  adequate controls over property and equipment.  
 {Expenditures and Revenues are summarized on the
  reverse page.}  | 
 
REGIONAL OFFICE OF
EDUCATION #48
FINANCIAL AUDIT
For The Year Ended
June 30, 2009
| 
   | 
  
  FY
  2009
   | 
  
  FY
  2008
   | 
 
  TOTAL REVENUES
   | 
  
   $7,435,356  | 
  
   $6,751,520  | 
 
| 
   Local Sources  | 
  
   $1,171,164  | 
  
   $990,172  | 
 
| 
   % of Total Revenues  | 
  
   15.75%  | 
  
   14.67%  | 
 
| 
   State Sources  | 
  
   $3,310,021  | 
  
   $2,613,656  | 
 
| 
   % of Total Revenues  | 
  
   44.52%  | 
  
   38.71%  | 
 
| 
   Federal Sources  | 
  
   $2,954,171  | 
  
   $3,147,692  | 
 
| 
   % of Total Revenues  | 
  
   39.73%  | 
  
   46.62%  | 
 
| 
   | 
 ||
| 
   TOTAL EXPENDITURES  | 
  
   $7,769,006  | 
  
   $6,810,961  | 
 
| 
   Salaries and Benefits  | 
  
   $3,212,005  | 
  
   $2,685,089  | 
 
| 
   % of Total Expenditures  | 
  
   41.34%  | 
  
   39.42%  | 
 
| 
   Purchased Services  | 
  
   $2,057,678  | 
  
   $1,848,301  | 
 
| 
   % of Total Expenditures  | 
  
   26.49%  | 
  
   27.14%  | 
 
| 
   All Other Expenditures  | 
  
   $2,499,323  | 
  
   $2,277,571  | 
 
| 
   % of Total Expenditures  | 
  
   32.17%  | 
  
   33.44%  | 
 
| 
   | 
 ||
| 
   TOTAL NET
  ASSETS  | 
  
   $1,025,938  | 
  
   $1,358,098  | 
 
| 
   | 
 ||
| 
   INVESTMENT IN CAPITAL ASSETS  | 
  
   $269,730  | 
  
   $290,652  | 
 
| 
   Percentages may not add due to rounding.  | 
 ||
| 
   REGIONAL SUPERINTENDENT    | 
 
| 
   During Audit
  Period:  Honorable Gerald Brookhart Currently:  Honorable Gerald Brookhart  | 
 
| 
   
 The Regional
  Office of Education #48 did not have sufficient internal controls over the
  financial reporting process. The Regional Office
  of Education #48 lacked adequate policies and procedures
  over certain administrative functions. 
	  The Regional
  Office of Education #48 did not have sufficient internal controls over the
  financial statement preparation process. The Regional
  Office of Education #48 did not have adequate controls over property and
  equipment. The Regional Office of
  Education #48 had unallowable expenditures charged to certain federal
  programs.  | 
  
  FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND
  RECOMMENDATIONS
  INADEQUATE INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER
  FINANCIAL REPORTING          The Regional Office of Education #48
  did not have sufficient internal controls over the financial reporting
  process.  The Regional Office of
  Education is required to maintain a system of controls over the financial
  reporting process to be able to initiate, authorize, record, process and
  report financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted
  accounting principles (GAAP).  In
  testing, auditors noted the following deficiencies in internal control: 
          Management or employees in the
  normal course of performing their assigned functions may not prevent or
  detect financial misstatements or possible fraudulent activity in a timely
  manner.  The ROE also may not be in
  compliance with laws, regulations, and contract provisions.          The Regional Office of Education #48
  did not consistently implement established internal controls.  Regional Office personnel were also not
  aware of what duties should be segregated in order to have a more effective
  process. (Finding 09-1, pages 12 a-c)          The Regional Office had attempted to
  segregate some of the accounting responsibilities, but there were areas that
  should be improved.            In order to correct the deficiencies
  noted above, auditors recommended that the Regional Office of Education #48 personnel
  should do the following: 1.      
	The Regional Office should restrict access
  to the accounting software to limit employees’ access to only the areas
  necessary for them to perform their daily activities.  2.      
	The authorized check signers should only
  include members of management who do not have access to the accounting
  software and are not part of the cash receipt or disbursement process.  3.      
	A policy should be implemented which
  strictly prohibits the same person from approving, authorizing, and receiving
  a payment.  4.      
	The approval process should be mandatory
  prior to any disbursement being made.   5.      
	The Regional Office should require all
  salary contracts to be accurate and up to date in personnel files.           The Regional Office of Education #48
  responded to the deficiencies identified as follows: 1.      
	Segregation of duties in the cash
  disbursement and accounting process: 
  Subsequent to year end the Regional Office reported that they had
  limited employees’ access to the accounting software to only the areas
  necessary for them to perform their daily activities.  Also, individuals with access to record
  information in the accounting software have been removed as check signers on
  ROE #48 accounts.  Further, the ROE
  signature stamp, which is used in the absence of the Regional Superintendent,
  is now kept in a secure location with restricted access to employees who are
  not a part of the disbursement process. 
  The Regional Office noted that these procedures were implemented
  September 15, 2009. 2.      
	Same employee approved and signed checks
  that were made payable to herself:  A
  practice was implemented as of September 15, 2009, which strictly prohibits
  the same person from approving, authorizing, and receiving a payment.  According to the Regional Office, a policy
  mandating and detailing that practice will be written and implemented by
  December 1, 2009.  3.      
	Approval not obtained until after
  disbursements took place:  The Regional
  Office has subsequently reviewed its approval process of disbursements and
  has reiterated the policy of obtaining appropriate approval prior to any
  disbursement during its monthly accounting staff meetings.  The ROE is currently considering
  implementing additional monitoring to ensure that the proper authorizations
  are being obtained on a timely basis.  4.      
	Salary contract omitted from the personnel
  file:  The Regional Office reported
  that as of September 15, 2009, all salary contracts were reviewed for
  accuracy, updated and placed in the appropriate personnel files.  The Regional Office is currently developing
  a policy that clarifies who must approve such contracts and a system to
  ensure that all contracts are obtained and archived.  LACK OF ADEQUATE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
  OVER CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS          The Regional Office of Education #48
  lacked adequate policies and procedures over certain administrative
  functions.  As a recipient of federal,
  State, and local funds from various grantor agencies, the Regional Office
  must incorporate certain administrative polices and procedures into their
  operations in order to comply with the grant agreements with these
  entities.  The Regional Office is
  required to account for each individual program’s activity in individual
  funds for accounting purposes.            The Regional Office #48 receives
  federal funding from the State to support school improvement services for
  schools in academic difficulty.  A
  large portion of this money is given to other Regional Offices to support
  their activities within the program, and the rest is the Regional Office #48’s
  portion.  During the year, the Regional
  Office created an internal fund to keep track of their portion of funds from
  Title I – School Improvement and Accountability program and the Coordination
  and Services Grant Program and transferred $117,594 and $7,147, respectively
  to this account.  Expenditure reports
  to ISBE were inaccurate because the ROE classified the transfer of these
  funds as “payments to other governments” rather than classifying the
  transaction in the specific expenditure categories where the funds were
  used.  (Finding 09-2, pages 12 d-e)          The auditors recommended that the
  Regional Office of Education #48 should ensure that in future fiscal years
  there are not any funds created that are not directly associated with a
  program.  Expenditure reports should
  accurately reflect the activity within a program.           The Peoria County Regional Office of
  Education #48 responded that as previously stated in its FY’08 audit response
  the ROE intends to comply with all the reporting requirements of the various State
  and federal regulatory agencies.  The
  Regional Office noted that they corrected this matter as soon as it was
  brought to their attention in the prior year audit.  Unfortunately, several months of the new
  fiscal year had already elapsed before this occurred.  The Regional Office noted that its current
  policy is that no funds will be created that are not directly associated with
  a program and they will continue to monitor to ensure that none are
  created.  While these funds were
  inaccurately reported as “payments to other governments,” the ROE believes
  that the funds were properly expended for program purposes. Controls Over Financial Statement Preparation
           The Regional Office of Education #48
  is required to maintain a system of controls over the preparation of financial
  statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
  (GAAP).  Regional Office internal
  controls over GAAP financial reporting should include adequately trained
  personnel with the knowledge and expertise to prepare and/or thoroughly
  review GAAP based financial statements to ensure that they are free of
  material misstatements and include all disclosures as required by the
  Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB).          The Regional Office of Education #48
  did not have sufficient internal controls over the financial statement
  preparation process.  While the
  Regional Office maintains controls over the processing of some accounting
  transactions, there are not sufficient controls over the preparation of the
  GAAP based financial statements for management or employees in the normal
  course of performing their assigned functions to prevent or detect financial
  statement misstatements and disclosure omissions in a timely manner.  For example, auditors, in their review of
  the Regional Office’s accounting records, noted that numerous
  adjusting entries were required to present the financial statements in
  accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.          According to Regional Office
  officials, they did not have adequate funding to hire and/or train their
  accounting personnel in order to comply with these requirements.  The Regional Office attempted to address this
  issue following the issuance of the audit report for fiscal year 2008;
  however, the Regional Office did not post adjusting entries in its accounting
  records to comply with GAAP. (Finding 09-3, pages 12 f-g) This
  finding was first reported in 2007.          The auditors recommended that, as part of its internal control over the
  preparation of its financial statements, including disclosures, the Peoria County Regional Office of
  Education #48 should implement
  a comprehensive preparation and/or review procedure to ensure that the
  financial statements, including disclosures, are complete and accurate.  Such procedures should be performed by a
  properly trained individual(s) possessing a thorough understanding of
  applicable generally accepted accounting principles, GASB pronouncements, and
  knowledge of the Regional Office of Education’s activities and operations.                    The Peoria Regional Office of
  Education #48 responded that it is in the process of developing a plan to
  identify and correct the issues that resulted in the need for numerous
  adjusting entries to present the financial statements in accordance with
  generally accepted accounting principles. 
  Further, the ROE noted that they are exploring options to strengthen their
  ability to review the financial statements to ensure that the financial
  statements, including disclosures, are complete and accurate. (For previous
  Regional Office response, see Digest Footnote #1.) INADEQUATE CONTROLS
  OVER PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT          The Regional Office of Education #48
  did not have adequate controls over property and equipment.  The ROE policy is to maintain detailed
  fixed asset records for both accounting purposes as well as insurance
  purposes for fixed assets costing $500 or more and that have a useful life of
  greater than one year.  Generally accepted
  accounting principles require that an inventory of all fixed assets and
  depreciation schedules for assets meeting the capitalization threshold for
  reporting be maintained.  In addition,
  the ROE is required to keep track of each asset by program in order to be in
  compliance with grantors.           Numerous issues were found with
  fixed asset reporting during auditor testing of the fixed assets within the
  Regional Office of Education #48 including: 
          An incomplete fixed asset listing
  does not provide an adequate basis for physical control and losses may occur
  without being detected.  Inaccurate
  recording of the book value of fixed assets and depreciation expense can
  cause the financial statements to be materially misstated.  Also, any assets that are required to be
  returned to the grantor after the end of the program cannot accurately be
  identified.         
  Regional Office personnel had not been adequately trained to
  understand the standards associated with fixed asset reporting. (Finding 09-4,
  pages 12 h-i)  This finding was first reported in 2006.          Auditors recommended that the
  Regional Office of Education #48 should ensure that each fixed asset addition
  is appropriately recorded in the listing and that each required attribute,
  such as useful life and cost, is included in the listing in accordance with
  the established policy.  If a purchase cost
  is not applicable to the asset, then the estimated fair market value at the
  date of acquisition should be recorded. 
  The Regional Office should also prepare listings of fixed assets by
  program.  Auditors also recommended
  that the Regional Office personnel involved with fixed asset reporting review
  the ROE Accounting Manual to learn and understand the standards involved with
  fixed asset reporting.          The Peoria County Regional Office of
  Education #48 responded that by June 30, 2010, it will ensure that each
  capital asset addition is appropriately recorded in the listing and that each
  required attribute, such as useful life and cost and program, is included in
  the listing in accordance with the established policy.  If a purchase cost is not applicable to the
  asset, then the estimated fair market value at the date of acquisition will
  be recorded.  Regional Office personnel
  involved with capital asset reporting will review the ROE Accounting Manual
  to learn and understand the standards involved with capital asset
  reporting.  Additionally, the Regional
  Office noted that a reconciliation of equipment accounts per the general ledger
  to additions recorded in capital asset records will be performed for the year
  ended June 30, 2010. (For previous Regional Office response, see Digest
  Footnote #2.) UNALLOWABLE
  COSTS CHARGED TO FEDERAL PROGRAMS          The Regional Office of Education #48 had
  unallowable expenditures charged to certain federal programs.  To be allowable under federal awards, costs
  must meet general criteria under Circular A-87.          Auditors tested the
  Title I School Improvement and Accountability Grant and the Special Education
  – IDEA Part D programs as major programs during fiscal year 2009.  As part of the compliance audit program we selected
  40 disbursements for each program (for a total of 80 tested) and reviewed the
  invoices for compliance with the programs. 
  The Regional Office received a total of $1,241,048 for the Title I
  School Improvement and Accountability Program and a total of $384,830 for the
  Special Education – IDEA Part D.           During compliance
  testing of these specific federal programs, auditors found: 
	·        
  Two disbursements of 40 tested were made for
  purchases that were not allowable costs per A-87.  One expenditure related to the purchase of
  two cell phones, the other related to entertainment costs.  
	·        
  One disbursement of 40 tested lacked adequate
  documentation to support the expenditure.  
	·        
  One disbursement of 40 tested lacked adequate
  documentation to provide support for the expenditure.  The disbursement related to cell phone
  usage.  The supporting documentation
  provided by the Regional Office did not have enough detail to demonstrate
  that the cell phones were not used for personal purposes.          The Regional Office #48
  personnel did not have adequate training and knowledge to establish
  sufficient internal control procedures that would detect noncompliance with requirements.
  (Finding 09-5, pages 13 a-c)          Auditors recommended that the
  Regional Office of Education #48 develop and implement procedures that will  ensure compliance
  with their federal programs.  We
  recommended that Circular A-87 be reviewed by all personnel involved with
  charging costs to federal programs. 
  The ROE should ensure its Controller has adequate and necessary
  training and accounting background to review invoice support for proper
  classification, proper support, compliance with federal award requirements
  and compliance with generally accepted accounting principles.           The Peoria County Regional Office of
  Education #48 responded that it will implement and develop procedures that
  will ensure compliance with their federal programs.  ROE administrators and bookkeepers involved
  with charging costs to federal programs will review Circular A-87.  The ROE also noted that they are in the
  process of developing a policy related to cell phone usage and the
  documentation of business vs. personal use. 
   AUDITORS’ OPINION          Our auditors state the Regional
  Office of Education #48’s financial statements as of June 30, 2009 are fairly
  stated in all material respects. _____________________________________ WILLIAM
  G. HOLLAND, Auditor General WGH:KJM SPECIAL
  ASSISTANT AUDITORS          Our
  special assistant auditors were Kemper CPA Group LLP. DIGEST FOOTNOTES #1: Controls Over Financial Statement
  Preparation —Previous Regional Office Response  In
  its prior response in 2008, the Regional Office of Education #48 responded that it will implement a comprehensive preparation and
  review procedure to ensure that the financial statements, including
  disclosures are complete and accurate. 
  Regional Office officials stated they are currently exploring the
  hiring of an individual with the necessary expertise to help accomplish this
  task, assuming finances are available for this purpose.  Further, they intend to use the
  aforementioned CPA personnel from the Peoria County Auditor’s office to help
  them in this area as well. #2:  INADEQUATE CONTROLS OVER PROPERTY AND
  EQUIPMENT – Previous Regional Office Response In
  its prior response in 2008, the
  Regional Office of Education #48 responded that it will, with assistance from CPA
  personnel from the Peoria County Auditor’s office, accomplish each of the
  recommended tasks listed above.  They were
  also researching appropriate fixed asset accounting system software, which
  they intend to purchase in order to reorganize the current records and
  properly record and maintain an inventory of all fixed assets and
  depreciation schedules in the future.  |