REPORT DIGEST COMMISSION ON EQUITY AND INCLUSION COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION FOR THE TWO YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 Release Date: September 1, 2026 FINDINGS THIS AUDIT: 8 CATEGORY: NEW -- REPEAT – TOTAL Category 1: 0 -- 1 -- 1 Category 2: 3 -- 4 -- 7 Category 3: 0 -- 0 -- 0 TOTAL: 3 -- 5 -- 8 FINDINGS LAST AUDIT: 6 State of Illinois, Office of the Auditor General CHRISTOPHER B. MEISTER, AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the Report contact: Office of the Auditor General, 400 West Monroe, Suite 306, Springfield, IL 62704-9849 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest and Full Report are also available on the worldwide web at www.auditor.illinois.gov SYNOPSIS • (25-1) The Commission had weaknesses related to information technology (IT) functions. • (25-2) The Commission demonstrated weaknesses related to personal services. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS WEAKNESSES IN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUNCTION The Commission on Equity and Inclusion (Commission) had weaknesses related to information technology (IT) functions. User Access Reviews During fieldwork, we examined the Commission’s system access controls over five significant applications with a material impact on the Commission’s financial information and/or operations. During our user access review testing, we noted there were no documented annual access reviews performed for these applications. Furthermore, the Commission did not oversee the review of its Active Directory accounts, nor did it complete any reviews or provide supporting documentation. During our user access testing, the Commission was unable to provide a user access listing for one application. Specifically, the Commission indicated it could not generate or obtain a complete population of users or supporting information necessary to perform user access testing. As a result, we were unable to determine whether user access to this system was appropriately authorized, consistent with job responsibilities, or timely removed for separated employees. Service Organization Control Reports During the examination period, we noted the Commission had not conducted independent internal control reviews of System and Organization Control (SOC) reports issued by the Department of Innovation and Technology (DoIT), an information technology service provider, and by a third-party external service provider. Additionally, the Commission had not assessed the impact of SOC report opinions on its operations or considered the applicability of Complementary User Entity Controls (CUECs). Furthermore, the Commission did not identify subservice organizations or perform procedures to evaluate their impact on its internal control environment. Identity Protection Policy The Commission did not establish or formally adopt a written Identity Protection Policy during the examination period. While the Commission indicated it follows DoIT guidance, it did not have a policy specific to its operations governing the protection and handling of personal information. Backups The Commission did not maintain documentation demonstrating backups were successfully completed for one system. Additionally, the Commission did not perform or document backup testing or verification procedures. Cybersecurity The Commission had not established an adequate cybersecurity program during the examination period. Specifically, the Commission had not: * established or documented cybersecurity roles and responsibilities; * developed and implemented a formal cybersecurity plan; * formally adopted a risk management methodology; * performed a cybersecurity risk assessment or engaged a third party to perform one; or, * classified its data or developed a data classification methodology. Confidential Information Tracking The Commission did not establish guidance for properly handling confidential, sensitive, and Personally Identifiable Information (PII), including: * classification of applications and data based on criticality and sensitivity in accordance with DoIT standards; * avoidance of unnecessary collection of PII; and, * minimization of PII use in testing, training, and research. (Finding 1, pages 8-11) We recommended the Commission strengthen its IT controls and governance to ensure systems and data are adequately protected and managed in compliance with State laws and standards. Specifically, the Commission should: * implement formal user access review procedures; * ensure complete and accurate system access listings; * establish procedures to obtain, review, and assess SOC reports, including complementary user controls and subservice organizations; * develop and adopt an Identity Protection Policy; * ensure backups are performed, documented, and tested; * establish and document a cybersecurity program, including -- establish and document roles and responsibilities, -- develop and implement a formal cybersecurity plan, -- formally adopt a risk management methodology, -- perform a cybersecurity risk assessment, and -- classify data with a developed data classification methodology; and * establish guidance for properly handling confidential, sensitive, and PII. The Commission accepted the finding and recommendation. The Commission stated it has a project manager with IT expertise contracted for FY2027 that will enable it to work with DoIT to fulfill the recommendation in a timely manner. WEAKNESSES RELATED TO PERSONAL SERVICES The Commission demonstrated weaknesses related to personal services. Timesheets During our testing of timesheets, we noted one of six (17%) employees tested did not submit their timesheet within one week of the last day covered by the timesheet. The timesheet was submitted four business days late based on the Commission’s expected weekly submission cycle. Additionally, we noted one of six (17%) employee timesheets tested was submitted without a signature or signature date; therefore, we were unable to determine whether the timesheet was submitted timely. Employee Performance Evaluations During our testing of employee performance evaluations, we noted the following exceptions: * Two of six (33%) employees tested did not have evaluations completed in a timely manner. The evaluations were completed 31 and 114 days late. * One of six (17%) employees tested did not sign and date the evaluation; therefore, we were unable to determine whether the evaluation was completed timely. * One of six (17%) employees did not have an evaluation completed during the examination period. (Finding 2, pages 12-13) We recommended the Commission strengthen controls over personal services to ensure compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and internal policies. Specifically, the Commission should implement procedures to ensure timesheets are submitted completely including date and signature, appropriately approved, and in a timely manner; and ensure employee performance evaluations are timely completed, signed and dated, and retained in accordance with required timeframes. The Commission accepted the finding and recommendation and stated the Commission’s HR staff regularly sends reminders to supervisors concerning timely eTime submissions. The Commission further stated it also sends email reminders to supervisors advising them of employee evaluation due dates. The Commission stated it will continue this cadence to ensure compliance with the applicable statutes. OTHER FINDINGS The remaining findings are purportedly being given attention by Commission personnel. We will review the Commission’s progress towards the implementation of our recommendations in our next State compliance examination. ACCOUNTANT’S OPINION The accountants conducted a State compliance examination of the Commission for the two years ended June 30, 2025, as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. The accountants qualified their report on State compliance for Finding 2025-001. Except for the noncompliance described in this finding, the accountants stated the Commission complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described in the report. This State compliance examination was conducted by Sikich CPA LLC. COURTNEY DZIERWA Deputy Auditor General This report is transmitted in accordance with Section 3-14 of the Illinois State Auditing Act. CHRISTOPHER B. MEISTER Auditor General CBM:meg