REPORT DIGEST DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION FOR THE TWO YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2019 Release Date: July 7, 2020 FINDINGS THIS AUDIT: 15 CATEGORY: NEW -- REPEAT -- TOTAL Category 1: 2 -- 1 -- 3 Category 2: 5 -- 7 -- 12 Category 3: 0 -- 0 -- 0 TOTAL: 7 -- 8 -- 15 FINDINGS LAST AUDIT: 11 Category 1: Findings that are material weaknesses in internal control and/or a qualification on compliance with State laws and regulations (material noncompliance). Category 2: Findings that are significant deficiencies in internal control and noncompliance with State laws and regulations. Category 3: Findings that have no internal control issues but are in noncompliance with State laws and regulations. State of Illinois, Office of the Auditor General FRANK J. MAUTINO, AUDITOR GENERAL To obtain a copy of the Report contact: Office of the Auditor General, Iles Park Plaza, 740 E. Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703 (217) 782-6046 or TTY (888) 261-2887 This Report Digest and Full Report are also available on the worldwide web at www.auditor.illinois.gov INTRODUCTION This digest covers our compliance examination of the Department of Employment Security (Department) for the two years ended June 30, 2019. A separate financial audit as of and for the year ended June 30, 2019 was previously released on March 3, 2020. In total, this report contains 15 findings, 5 of which were also reported in the financial audit. SYNOPSIS • (19-06) The Department did not have adequate controls over the completion and submission of reconciliations relating to expenses, revenues, cash, and locally held funds. • (19-09) The Department did not have adequate controls over its property and equipment and related records. • (19-11) The Department did not implement adequate internal controls related to cybersecurity programs and practices. • (19-12) The Department lacks security at the Metro South Regional office facility. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS INADEQUATE CONTROLS OVER MONTHLY RECONCILIATIONS The Department did not have adequate controls over the completion and submission of reconciliations relating to expenses, revenues, cash, and locally held funds. During our testing of 48 monthly expenditure reconciliation reports, we noted the following: • Sixteen (33%) monthly reconciliations were not prepared for Fiscal Year 2018. • Six (13%) monthly reconciliations were not completed timely, three for Fiscal Year 2018 and three for Fiscal Year 2019. During our testing of 48 monthly revenue reconciliation reports, we noted the following: • Sixteen (33%) monthly reconciliations were not prepared for Fiscal Year 2018. • Two (4%) monthly reconciliations were not completed timely for Fiscal Year 2019. During our testing of 48 monthly cash reconciliation reports, we noted the following: • Twenty-seven (56%) monthly reconciliations were not prepared timely. • Nine (19%) monthly reconciliations were prepared prior to the completion of the associated monthly revenue reconciliation. During our testing of 48 locally held fund reconciliations, we noted four (8%) monthly reconciliations were not prepared timely. (Finding 6, pages 17-18) We recommended the Department consistently complete required monthly reconciliations relating to expenses, revenues, cash, and locally held funds in a timely manner. Department management accepted the finding. INADEQUATE CONTROLS OVER PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT RECORDS The Department did not have adequate controls over its property and equipment and related records. A few of the issues we noted follows: During our testing of 60 assets selected from the Department’s inventory records, we noted the following: • Twenty-one (35%) items were on the inventory listing, but were not found on site. • Two (3%) items were found on site, but no ID tag was found on the equipment. During our testing of 60 assets found throughout the Department’s offices, we noted the following: • Fifty-two (87%) items were found on site with a valid ID tag, but could not be found on the inventory listing. • Two (3%) items were confirmed to be transferable property but had not been transferred as of the date of testing. During our testing of 7 surplus items held at the Department, we noted 4 (57%) items were found on site with a valid ID tag, but could not be found on the inventory listing. (Finding 9, pages 22-24) This finding was first reported in 2015. We recommended the Department adhere to the requirements of the Illinois Procurement Code, the State Property Control Act, the Illinois Administrative Code, the Fiscal Control and Internal Auditing Act, and the Department’s Procedures Manual and determine the Department has sufficient trained personnel to maintain property records and accurately report information to DCMS. We also recommended the Department review procedures for maintaining surplus/unused items in order to minimize the amount of idle property and equipment. Department management accepted the finding. WEAKNESSES IN CYBERSECURITY PROGRAMS AND PRACTICES The Department did not implement adequate internal controls related to cybersecurity programs and practices. As a result of the Department’s mission to administer the State’s unemployment claims, it maintains computer systems that contain large volumes of confidential or personal information such as names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and federal and State tax information of the citizens of the State. During our examination of the Department’s cybersecurity program, practices, and control of confidential information, we noted the Department did not: • Classify its data to identify and ensure adequate protection of information (i.e. confidential or personal information) most susceptible to attack. • Require employees and contractors to review and acknowledge receipt of the Department’s security policies. In addition, we requested the Department provide a population of employees who were to have completed the annual cybersecurity training. In response to our request, the Department provided the population; however, the Department did not provide documentation demonstrating the population was sufficiently precise and detailed under the Professional Standards promulgated by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AU-C § 330, AU-C § 530). Even given the population limitations noted, we performed testing to determine if employees had completed the annual cybersecurity training as required by the Data Security on State Computers Act. Our testing noted 4 of 39 (10%) employees sampled had not completed the annual cybersecurity training. Furthermore, the Department did not require 4 of 4 (100%) new employees sampled to complete the annual cybersecurity training upon employment. Furthermore, an individual on 75-day appointment worked remotely on payroll matters which required them to receive confidential information. However, the individual was utilizing their personal computer and the Department was not aware of the security control implemented on the computer. Additionally, there are no policies or procedures in place at the Department to ensure the protection and safe disposal of payroll information from personal devices of employees working remotely. (Finding 11, pages 26-27) The Department has the ultimate responsibility for ensuring confidential information is protected from accidental or unauthorized disclosure. Specifically, we recommended the Department: • Classify data to ensure adequate protection of confidential or personal information most susceptible to attack. • Ensure all employees and contractors review and acknowledge receipt of the Department’s security policies. • Ensure all staff members annually complete cybersecurity training as outlined in the Data Security on State Computers Act. Additionally, the Department should maintain documentation regarding the completeness and accuracy of the population related to cybersecurity training. • Ensure adequate security controls are implemented on all equipment utilized by employees, appointments and contractors. Department management accepted the finding. INADEQUATE SECURITY AT LOCAL OFFICE The Department lacks security at the Metro South Regional office facility. During a tour of the Metro South Regional office facility, we noted that various areas of the facility are secured by keypad access. However, there is only one access code that grants access throughout the facility, including the employee side entrance. Per inquiry, the code has been provided to all employees and cleaning staff, and has no time restrictions. As there is no security system or cameras in place, there is a risk that employees, former employees, and cleaning staff can enter the building after hours and gain access to sensitive information. (Finding 12, page 28) We recommended the Department implement enhanced security measures to access and monitor the Metro South Regional office facility. Department management accepted the finding. OTHER FINDINGS The remaining findings pertain to inadequate controls over receivable allowances, penalty and interest receivables, write offs, GenTax access, and telecommunications devices, inaccurate refunds payable, performance evaluations not completed timely, inadequate review of access rights for terminated employees, weaknesses in cybersecurity programs and practices, and noncompliance with the Unemployment Insurance Act, the Election Code and the Public Employment Office Act. We will review the Department’s progress towards the implementation of our recommendations in our next engagement. AUDITOR’S OPINION The financial audit report was previously released. The auditors stated the financial statements of the Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund of the Department as of and for the year ended June 30, 2019 are fairly stated in all material respects. ACCOUNTANT’S OPINION The accountants conducted a compliance examination of the Department for the two years ended June 30, 2019, as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act. The accountants qualified their report on State compliance for Findings 2019-001, 2019-002, and 2019-003. Except for the noncompliance described in these findings, the accountants stated the Department complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described in the report. The financial audit and this compliance examination were conducted by RSM US LLP. JANE CLARK Division Director This report is transmitted in accordance with Section 3-14 of the Illinois State Auditing Act. FRANK J. MAUTINO Auditor General FJM:dmg